Flag of AngolaANGOLA

Report updated April 2010

Summary of law reform necessary to achieve full prohibition

Prohibition is still to be achieved in the home, penal institutions and alternative care settings.

We have been unable to establish whether or not legislation confirms a right of parents and others with parental authority to administer physical punishment, but legal provisions against violence are not interpreted as prohibiting all corporal punishment in childrearing. The near universal acceptance of corporal punishment in “disciplining” children necessitates a clear statement in law that all corporal punishment, however “light”, is prohibited.

Explicit prohibition should be enacted of corporal punishment in all schools, public and private, all institutions accommodating children in conflict with the law, and all alternative care settings, including public and private day care, residential institutions, foster care, etc.

Current legality of corporal punishment

Home

Corporal punishment is lawful in the home. Provisions against violence and abuse in the Family Code, the Penal Code (1886), Decree No. 58 (1982) and the Constitution (2010) are not interpreted as prohibiting corporal punishment in childrearing.

Schools

Corporal punishment is supposedly prohibited in schools, but we have no details of applicable legislation.

Penal system

Corporal punishment is unlawful as a sentence for crime under the Criminal Code, the Court for Minors Act (1996) and the Code of Procedure for the Court for Minors, which make no provision for judicial corporal punishment. The Constitution prohibits cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of every citizen.

There is no explicit prohibition of corporal punishment as a disciplinary measure in penal institutions.

Alternative care

There is no explicit prohibition of corporal punishment in alternative care settings.

Prevalence research

None identified.

Recommendations by human rights treaty bodies

Committee on the Rights of the Child

“The Committee is concerned at the common use of corporal punishment in families and in schools and other institutions for children.

“The Committee recommends that the State party take effective measures to enforce the ban on corporal punishment in schools and other institutions; to prohibit the use of violence against children, including corporal punishment, by parents and other caregivers; and to undertake campaigns to educate families, teachers, and other professionals working with and for children on alternative ways of disciplining children.

“The Committee is concerned about the growing cases of abuse and violence against children, including sexual abuse in their homes, in schools and in other institutions.

“The Committee recommends that the State party strengthen current efforts to address the problem of child abuse, including by ensuring that:

b) public education campaigns about the negative consequences of ill-treatment and preventive programmes, including family development programmes, promoting positive, non-violent forms of discipline are conducted….”
(3 November 2004, CRC/C/15/Add.246, Concluding observations on initial report, paras. 32, 33, 36 and 37)

This analysis has been compiled from information from governmental and non-governmental sources, including reports on implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Every effort is made to maintain its accuracy. Please send us updating information and details of sources for missing information: info@endcorporalpunishment.org.

Back to top